PrivacyCopyright and Disclaimer SitemapFeedbackHelpSearch
Home
About Us
Recent News
Current Projects
Publications - Active
Digest
Contribute to Law Reform
Law Reform Links
Contact Us
Where am I now? Lawlink > Law Reform Commission > Publications > Index

Report 89 (1999) - Contribution Between Persons Liable for the Same Damage

Index

How to purchase a copy of this report

History of this Reference (Digest)

Agency 
and joint wrongdoers 1.6
America see United States of America 
Apportionment in contribution proceedings 
according to what is just and equitable 2.26, 3.9, 3.31, 4.13, 4.28, 4.49-4.51
sum to be apportioned where judgment 4.14-4.16, 4.28
sum to be apportioned where full settlement 4.25-4.29
Assessment of damages 
finality of, in contribution proceedings 4.13-4.16, 4.24
general principles 2.1
under different regimes 3.8, 3.16, 4.14, 4.39
Attorney General’s review of tort liability 1.2, 2.5
Breach of fiduciary duty 3.11, 3.28
Breach of statutory duty 3.5, 3.28
British Columbia (Canada) 
system of proportionate liability in 2.28, 2.44, 2.53
Building legislation 2.33-2.35
trade practices legislation as means of circumventing 2.54
Capping liability see Limitation of damages 
Co-insurers 
contribution between 1.10
Co-sureties 
contribution between 1.10
Co-trustees 
contribution between 1.10
Common action 
and joint wrongdoers 1.6
Concurrent liability 3.22
effect of, on rights to contribution 3.11-3.15
    - expansion of the tort of negligence 3.11, 3.15
    - plaintiff’s choice of action 3.14
Concurrent tortfeasors see Concurrent wrongdoers and Contribution between concurrent tortfeasors 
Concurrent wrongdoers see also Contribution between concurrent wrongdoers other than tortfeasors and Defendants 
distinction between joint wrongdoers and several wrongdoers 5.8
sanction in damages, and 5.3-5.7
Contract 
choice of plaintiff to proceed under contract or other head of liability 3.14
circumventing solidary liability by 2.21, 2.22, 2.70
concurrent liability generally 3.11, 3.14, 3.15
concurrent liability in tort and contract 3.12, 3.13
different nature of liability in tort and 3.9, 3.10
express contractual provisions overriding general contribution regime 3.30, 3.31
intrusion of tortfeasors into private contractual arrangements 3.18
need to include in contribution legislation 1.1
sanction in damages and 5.5
Contractual limitations of liability 3.14, 3.18-3.21, 5.5
Contribution see also Contribution between concurrent tortfeasors, Contribution between concurrent wrongdoers other than tortfeasors, and Contribution between mixed concurrent wrongdoers 
between co-insurers 1.10
between co-sureties 1.10
between co-trustees 1.10
between concurrent wrongdoers 1.9
D1’s claim for contribution 4.1-4.48
    - where D1 and P settle without judgment 4.17-4.37
    - where D2 successfully defends an action brought on the merits 4.40-4.42
    - where P fails for want of prosecution 4.46
    - where P fails in an action against D2 4.38-4.48
    - where D2 is found not liable in 3rd party proceedings 4.47-4.48
    - where P obtains judgment against D1 4.5-4.16
    - where P’s action against D2 is time barred 4.43-4.45
definition 1.11
equitable 3.31
legislation in New South Wales, need to reform 1.1
procedures for claiming 2.45-2.52, 2.56, 3.17, 4.4, 5.26
provided for by contract 3.30, 3.31
relationship to solidary liability 2.2, 2.21, 2.66
restitutionary nature 3.19
statutes which do not provide for 2.35, 2.54, 3.32, 3.33
wider law of 1.10
Contribution between concurrent tortfeasors 
legislation 1.15
    - need to reform 1.1
    - reason for introduction 1.13
not available at common law 1.12
torts to which contribution applies 3.2-3.6
    - intentional torts 3.4
    - torts of strict liability 3.5, 3.6
    - torts that are crimes 3.3, 3.4
Contribution between concurrent wrongdoers other than tortfeasors 
not covered by current legislation 1.1, 1.16
Contribution between mixed concurrent wrongdoers 3.7-3.29
benefit of a contractual term limiting liability 3.18-3.21
    - determining the contributable sum 3.21
difficulties in extending the right to contribution 3.8-3.17
    - adding to the complexity of the law 3.16-3.17
    - different nature of liability in tort and contract 3.9-3.10
    - effect of concurrent liability 3.11-3.15
extension of judgment bar rule to cover 5.10, 5.11
legislative implementation 3.26-3.31
limitation periods 
    - primary action 5.20
    - contribution 5.27
not covered by current legislation 1.16, 3.7
views of other law reform agencies 3.24
Contributory negligence 
analogous to apportionment of liability among defendants 2.27
contribution where contributory negligence not available 3.5, 4.14, 4.39
differences from contribution 2.30
general principles of 2.22, 2.26, 2.30
not included in current review 1.1
proportionate liability where plaintiff contributorily negligent 2.26-2.32
Costs, sanction in see Sanction in costs 
Covenant not to sue 5.12
Damages see Apportionment of damages, Assessment of damages, Exemplary damages, Limitation of damages, Sanction in damages, Statutory liability to pay damages 
Davis Report 2.7, 2.8, 2.17, 2.44, 2.53
evaluation of 2.8
Defendants 
“deep pocket”, targeting of 2.3, 2.23, 2.64, 2.65, 2.69
insolvent, uninsured or not amenable to jurisdiction 2.3, 2.17, 2.23, 2.29, 2.58, 2.65, 2.68
proportionate liability for particular defendants 
    - building industry 2.33-2.35
    - professional groups 2.36
Discussion Paper (DP 38) 1.3, 2.8
Dust Diseases Tribunal (NSW) 
abolition of settlement bar rule 5.14
Equitable, just and see Just and equitable 
Equitable rights of contribution 3.31
Equity 
concurrent liability 3.11
Exemplary damages 
and single judgment rule
Fiduciary duty see Breach of fiduciary duty 
Finality of judgment see Judgment 
Full compensation 
aim of, to plaintiffs 2.17, 4.32, 4.34
right of plaintiffs to 1.13, 2.2, 2.21, 2.22, 4.31, 4.36
In solidum, liability see Solidary liability 
Indemnities, releases and see Releases and indemnities 
Indemnity 
order amounting to full 4.50
rights of 3.30, 4.22
Insurance see Liability insurance 
Interim Report (LRC 65) 1.2, 2.5, 2.7, 2.65
Ireland 
Civil Liability Act 2.29, 2.44, 3.24, 4.16, 4.32, 4.44
proportionate liability in 2.29, 2.44
Joinder of parties 3.17, 4.4, 5.26
flexibility of, in Australia 2.56, 2.67
Joint and several liability see Solidary liability 
Joint tortfeasors see also Concurrent wrongdoers, Several tortfeasors and Joint wrongdoers 
distinction between, and several tortfeasors 5.8
    - abolition of 1.15
judgment bar rule, and 5.3, 5.9, 5.10
settlement bar rule, and 5.12, 5.13
single judgment rule, and 5.16
Joint wrongdoers see also Several wrongdoers and Joint tortfeasors 1.4
definition 1.6
distinction between, and several wrongdoers 1.4, 1.5, 5.8, 5.9
judgment bar rule, and 5.9-5.11
settlement bar rule, and 5.12-5.15
single judgment rule, and 5.16-5.17
Judgment bar rule 1.6, 1.7, 5.9-5.11
abolition of 1.15, 5.3, 5.10, 5.11
Judgments see also Settlements, Single judgment rule, Judgment bar rule 
finality of, as to liability against D1 
    - consent judgments 4.9-4.11
    - judgments obtained by fraud or collusion 4.9-4.11
finality of, as to quantum against D2 4.13-4.16
in favour of D2, on the merits 4.40-4.42
Juries 
use of, in civil matters 2.14, 5.4
Just and equitable 
apportionment according to what is 2.26, 3.9, 3.31, 4.13, 4.28, 4.49-4.51
Liability see Apportionment of liability, Concurrent liability, Proportionate liability, Solidary liability 
Liability, limitation of see Limitation of damages and Contractual limitations of liability 
Liability in solidum see Solidary liability 
Liability insurance 
compulsory, in conjunction with proportionate liability 2.33-2.35
crisis in 2.3, 2.57-2.59
effect of proportionate liability on 2.61, 2.62
effect of solidary liability on 2.58-2.60
Limitation of actions 5.18-5.27
statutory limitation period for contribution actions 5.23-5.27
statutory limitation period for P’s action against D2 4.43-4.45
statutory limitation period relevant to the primary cause of action 5.19-5.22
Limitation of damages see also Contractual limitation of liability 
alternative to proportionate liability 2.70
trend in New South Wales 2.18
    - motor accidents 2.18, 4.14
    - Professional Standards Act 1994 (NSW) 2.19
    - workers compensation 2.18
Limited liability partnerships 2.70
Merryweather v Nixan see Rule in Merryweather v Nixan 
Mixed concurrent wrongdoers see Contribution between mixed concurrent wrongdoers 
Montana (USA) 
reforms to solidary liability 2.39
Negligence 
expansion of tort of 3.11
Negligence, contributory see Contributory negligence 
New South Wales Attorney General see Attorney General’s review of tort liability 
New South Wales Law Reform Commission see Interim Report (LRC 65) and Discussion Paper (DP 38) 
Plaintiffs see also Full compensation 
classification of (for proportionate liability) 2.11, 2.37
participants in financial transactions 2.11, 2.22
personal injury, separate treatment of 2.20
Procedure see also Sanction in damages, Limitation of actions, Single judgment rule, settlement bar rule and judgment bar rule 
burden of conduct of proceedings 2.45-2.47
general procedural issues 2.48-2.52, 5.1-5.27
joinder of parties 2.56, 2.67, 3.17, 4.4, 5.26
Professional liability insurance see Liability insurance 
Professionals 
entry to professions, deterrence of 2.63
limiting liability of 2.19
policy considerations concerning liability of 2.24
Professional Standards Act 1994 (NSW) 2.19, 2.36, 2.54
proportionate liability for particular 2.36
Proportionate liability 
arguments concerning proportionate liability 2.15-2.68
    - economic issues 2.57-2.68
    - policy issues 2.16-2.42
    - procedural issues 2.43-2.56
building legislation 2.33-2.35
calls to introduce 2.3
conclusions in Davis Report 2.7
conclusions of New South Wales Law Reform Commission 2.69-2.71
    - in Discussion Paper (DP 38) 2.8
    - in Interim Report (LRC 65) 2.5
conclusions of New Zealand Law Commission 2.10
conclusions of Victorian Attorney General’s Law Reform Advisory Council 2.12
definition 2.4
effect on liability insurance 2.61, 2.62
effect on risk averse behaviour 2.65-2.68
effect on settlements 2.53
fairness to wrongdoers 2.23
for non-economic loss in personal injury cases 2.5
for professional groups 2.11, 2.12
in British Columbia 2.28, 2.44, 2.53
in Ireland 2.29-2.44
in United States 2.13, 2.14, 2.44
justice for wrongdoers and 2.24
limited introductions of 2.25-2.42, 2.71
    - Commission’s conclusion concerning 2.42
    - industry specific approach 2.33-2.36
    - judicial discretion 2.41
    - where defendant responsible for less than specified percentage of liability 2.38-2.40
    - where plaintiff contributorily negligent 2.26-2.32
procedural issues 2.43-2.56
proposals of Canadian Standing Senate Committee 2.11
Prosecution see Want of prosecution 
Releases and indemnities 4.37, 5.12
Risk aversion 2.65-2.68
Rule in Merryweather v Nixan 1.12-1.15
effect of 1.13
statutory exceptions 1.14, 1.15
Sanction in costs 5.1, 5.2, 5.9
Sanction in damages 1.15, 5.3-5.7, 5.9
Settlement bar rule 1.6, 5.12-5.15
abrogation of 1.15, 5.13, 5.14
Settlements see also Judgments  
effect of proportionate liability on 2.53
effect of solidary liability on 2.53
effect on claims for contribution 4.17-4.37
full settlements 4.18-4.29
partial settlements 4.18, 4.30-4.37
policy of encouraging 4.23, 4.28, 4.31, 4.33-4.36, 5.14
Several tortfeasors see also Joint tortfeasors and Several wrongdoers 
distinction between, and joint tortfeasors 
    - abolition of 1.15, 5.8
judgment bar rule, and 5.9
Several wrongdoers see also Joint wrongdoers and  
Several tortfeasors 
definition 1.7
distinction between, and joint wrongdoers 1.4, 1.5, 5.8, 5.9
Single judgment rule 5.16, 5.17
Solidary liability 2.1-2.71
arguments concerning 2.15-2.68
    - Commission’s conclusion 2.69-2.71
    - economic issues 2.57-2.68
    - policy issues 2.16-2.42
    - procedural issues 2.43-2.56
Attorney General’s (NSW) review of 1.2
calls to replace with proportionate liability 2.3
circumventing by contractual limitations 2.21, 2.22, 2.70
conclusion of New Zealand Law Commission 2.10
conclusion of Victorian Attorney General’s Law Reform Advisory Council 2.12
contractual limitations on 2.12, 2.22, 2.70
Davis Report 2.7
deep-pocket defendants, effect on 2.3, 2.23
definition 2.2
Discussion Paper, proposals by New South Wales Law Reform Commission 2.8
effect of, on entrepreneurial enterprise/service provision 2.64
effect of, on entry to the professions 2.63
effect of, on liability insurance 2.58-2.60
effect of, on risk aversion 2.65-2.68
effect of, on settlements 2.53
general principle 1.8
Interim Report on, by NSW Law Reform Commission 1.2
liability insurance crisis and 2.58-2.60
modifications of, in United States 2.13, 2.14
procedural issues 2.43-2.56
relationship to law of contribution 1.13
unfairness to wrongdoers 2.23
      Texas (USA) 
      reform to solidary liability 2.39
      Third party proceedings  
      where D2 found not liable in 4.47, 4.48
      Time bar see Limitation of actions 
      Tort see also Contribution between concurrent tortfeasors 
      concurrent liability 3.11-3.15
      choice of plaintiff to proceed under tort or other head of liability 3.14
      different nature of liability in contract and 3.9, 3.10
      general principles 2.1, 2.2, 2.21, 2.23
      need to re-examine causation, remoteness and proximity 2.24
      Tortfeasors see Contribution between concurrent tortfeasors 
      Trade practices legislation 
      contribution not provided for 2.35, 2.54, 3.32, 3.33
      Trust, breach of see Breach of fiduciary duty 2.19
      United States of America 
      reforms to solidary liability 2.13, 2.14, 2.39, 2.44
      Unjust enrichment 3.22
      Vicarious liability  
      and joint wrongdoers 1.6
      exempted from Davis reforms 2.7
      Want of prosecution 
      where P fails for 4.46
      Williams, Glanville 2.29, 3.24, 4.32, 4.44, 5.22
      Wisconsin (USA) 
      reform to solidary liability 2.39
      Wrongdoers see Concurrent wrongdoers, Joint wrongdoers, Mixed concurrent wrongdoers and Several wrongdoers 
  


Previous Page | Back to Lawlink Home | Top of Page
  Last updated 26 May 1999   Crown Copyright 2002 ©  
Hosted by
Lawlink NSW